| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2019 09:42:24 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 16/17] kvm: x86: Add support IA32_CORE_CAPABILITY MSR
On 02/03/19 03:45, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> From: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...ux.intel.com>
>
> MSR IA32_CORE_CAPABILITY is a feature-enumerating MSR, bit 5 of which
> reports the capability of enabling detection of split locks (will be
> supported on future processors based on Tremont microarchitecture and
> later).
>
> Please check the latest Intel Architecture Instruction Set Extensions
> and Future Features Programming Reference for more detailed information
> on the MSR and the split lock bit.
>
> 1. Expose it to user space as a feature-enumerating MSR, so that user
> space can query it.
>
> 2. Emualte MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPABILITY with vmx->core_capability. And add the
> get and set handler of MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPABILITY.
> For uesrspace, it can set this MSR when customizing features of guest,
> also it can read the value of this MSR of guest.
> For guest, as it's a feature-enumerating MSR, guest only can read it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h | 1 +
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
> 4 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 180373360e34..208f15570d17 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -1527,6 +1527,7 @@ int kvm_pv_send_ipi(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long ipi_bitmap_low,
> unsigned long icr, int op_64_bit);
>
> u64 kvm_get_arch_capabilities(void);
> +u64 kvm_get_core_capability(void);
> void kvm_define_shared_msr(unsigned index, u32 msr);
> int kvm_set_shared_msr(unsigned index, u64 val, u64 mask);
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> index 30a6bcd735ec..3e03c6e1e558 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -1679,6 +1679,12 @@ static int vmx_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
>
> msr_info->data = to_vmx(vcpu)->spec_ctrl;
> break;
> + case MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPABILITY:
> + if (!msr_info->host_initiated &&
> + !guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_CORE_CAPABILITY))
> + return 1;
> + msr_info->data = vmx->core_capability;
> + break;
> case MSR_IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES:
> if (!msr_info->host_initiated &&
> !guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_ARCH_CAPABILITIES))
> @@ -1891,6 +1897,21 @@ static int vmx_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
> vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(vmx->vmcs01.msr_bitmap, MSR_IA32_PRED_CMD,
> MSR_TYPE_W);
> break;
> + case MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPABILITY:
> + if (!msr_info->host_initiated)
> + return 1;
> + if (data & ~CORE_CAP_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT)
> + return 1;
> +
> + /*
> + * Since AC split lock is a hardware feature, and there is no
> + * software emulation yet, we cannot enable it for guest if
> + * host hardware doesn't support it.
> + */
> + if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT))
> + data &= ~CORE_CAP_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT;
> + vmx->core_capability = data;
> + break;
> case MSR_IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES:
> if (!msr_info->host_initiated)
> return 1;
> @@ -4083,6 +4104,8 @@ static void vmx_vcpu_setup(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
> ++vmx->nmsrs;
> }
>
> + vmx->core_capability = kvm_get_core_capability();
> +
> vmx->arch_capabilities = kvm_get_arch_capabilities();
>
> vm_exit_controls_init(vmx, vmx_vmexit_ctrl());
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
> index 0ac0a64c7790..cc22379991f3 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
> @@ -191,6 +191,7 @@ struct vcpu_vmx {
> u64 msr_guest_kernel_gs_base;
> #endif
>
> + u64 core_capability;
> u64 arch_capabilities;
> u64 spec_ctrl;
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 941f932373d0..c3c9e3f2d08a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -1125,7 +1125,8 @@ static u32 msrs_to_save[] = {
> #endif
> MSR_IA32_TSC, MSR_IA32_CR_PAT, MSR_VM_HSAVE_PA,
> MSR_IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL, MSR_IA32_BNDCFGS, MSR_TSC_AUX,
> - MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, MSR_IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES,
> + MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPABILITY,
> + MSR_IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES,
> MSR_IA32_RTIT_CTL, MSR_IA32_RTIT_STATUS, MSR_IA32_RTIT_CR3_MATCH,
> MSR_IA32_RTIT_OUTPUT_BASE, MSR_IA32_RTIT_OUTPUT_MASK,
> MSR_IA32_RTIT_ADDR0_A, MSR_IA32_RTIT_ADDR0_B,
> @@ -1197,11 +1198,22 @@ static u32 msr_based_features[] = {
>
> MSR_F10H_DECFG,
> MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV,
> + MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPABILITY,
> MSR_IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES,
> };
>
> static unsigned int num_msr_based_features;
>
> +u64 kvm_get_core_capability(void)
> +{
> + u64 data;
> +
> + rdmsrl_safe(MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPABILITY, &data);
This patch should be merged with the previous patch. Also here you
should add:
data &= CORE_CAP_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT;
so that non-virtualizable features are hidden and
if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT))
data |= CORE_CAP_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT;
so that userspace gets "for free" the FMS list that will be added
later to the kernel.
Thanks,
Paolo
> +
> + return data;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_get_core_capability);
> +
> u64 kvm_get_arch_capabilities(void)
> {
> u64 data;
> @@ -1227,6 +1239,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_get_arch_capabilities);
> static int kvm_get_msr_feature(struct kvm_msr_entry *msr)
> {
> switch (msr->index) {
> + case MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPABILITY:
> + msr->data = kvm_get_core_capability();
> + break;
> case MSR_IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES:
> msr->data = kvm_get_arch_capabilities();
> break;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists