[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190304014838.GV26041@dragon>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2019 09:48:40 +0800
From: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
To: Alison Wang <alison.wang@....com>
Cc: leoyang.li@....com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: ls1028a: add pmu dt nodes
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 09:57:52AM +0800, Alison Wang wrote:
> This patch adds pmu dt nodes for LS1028A.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alison Wang <alison.wang@....com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi | 5 +++++
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi
> index a8cf92a..36ef9c5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi
> @@ -89,6 +89,11 @@
> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>;
> };
>
> + pmu {
> + compatible = "arm,armv8-pmuv3";
Shouldn't we use "arm,cortex-a72-pmu" as compatible for better?
Shawn
> + interrupts = <GIC_PPI 7 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + };
> +
> gic: interrupt-controller@...0000 {
> compatible= "arm,gic-v3";
> #address-cells = <2>;
> --
> 1.7.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists