[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190304104541.25745-2-peng.fan@nxp.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2019 10:33:55 +0000
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
To: "dennis@...nel.org" <dennis@...nel.org>,
"tj@...nel.org" <tj@...nel.org>, "cl@...ux.com" <cl@...ux.com>
CC: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"van.freenix@...il.com" <van.freenix@...il.com>,
Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] percpu: pcpu_next_md_free_region: inclusive check for
PCPU_BITMAP_BLOCK_BITS
If the block [contig_hint_start, contig_hint_start + contig_hint)
matches block->right_free area, need use "<=", not "<".
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
---
V1:
Based on https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/10832459/ applied linux-next
boot test on qemu aarch64
mm/percpu.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/percpu.c b/mm/percpu.c
index 5ee90fc34ea3..0f91f1d883c6 100644
--- a/mm/percpu.c
+++ b/mm/percpu.c
@@ -390,7 +390,8 @@ static void pcpu_next_md_free_region(struct pcpu_chunk *chunk, int *bit_off,
*/
*bits = block->contig_hint;
if (*bits && block->contig_hint_start >= block_off &&
- *bits + block->contig_hint_start < PCPU_BITMAP_BLOCK_BITS) {
+ *bits + block->contig_hint_start <=
+ PCPU_BITMAP_BLOCK_BITS) {
*bit_off = pcpu_block_off_to_off(i,
block->contig_hint_start);
return;
--
2.16.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists