[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190304195149.7cca9c64@xps13>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2019 19:51:49 +0100
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@...nel.org>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Harvey Hunt <harveyhuntnexus@...il.com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] dt-bindings: mtd: ingenic: Add compatible
strings for JZ4740 and JZ4725B
Hi Paul,
> >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/ingenic,jz4780-nand.txt
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/ingenic,jz4780-nand.txt
> >> @@ -6,7 +6,10 @@ memory-controllers/ingenic,jz4780-nemc.txt), and >> thus NAND device nodes must
> >> be children of the NEMC node.
> >> >> Required NAND controller device properties:
> >> -- compatible: Should be set to "ingenic,jz4780-nand".
> >> +- compatible: Should be one of:
> >> + * ingenic,jz4740-nand
> >> + * ingenic,jz4725b-nand
> >> + * ingenic,jz4780-nand
> >
> > Wouldn't "-nand-controller" suffix be better? Of course in the driver
> > you should still check for jz4780-nand.
>
> So I would be compatible with:
> * ingenic,jz4740-nand-controller
> * ingenic,jz4725b-nand-controller
> * ingenic,jz4780-nand
> ?
>From a driver POV I would even prefer ingenic,jz4780-nand-controller. I
don't know what's best here. Maybe Boris or Rob can help?
Thanks,
Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists