lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190304191006.GA51516@calvinowens-mba.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Mon, 4 Mar 2019 19:10:14 +0000
From:   Calvin Owens <calvinowens@...com>
To:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
CC:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] printk: Add a device attribute for the per-console
 loglevel

On Monday 03/04 at 17:06 +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (03/01/19 16:48), Calvin Owens wrote:
> > +static struct attribute *console_sysfs_attrs[] = {
> > +	&dev_attr_loglevel.attr,
> > +	NULL,
> > +};
> > +ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(console_sysfs);
> > +
> >  static struct bus_type console_subsys = {
> >  	.name = "console",
> > +	.dev_groups = console_sysfs_groups,
> >  };
> 
> Do we really need to change this dynamically? Console options are
> traditionally static (boot param or DT). Can we also be happy with
> the static per-console loglevel?

It really does need to be runtime configurable: there are a lot of usecases
that enables, like turning the fast console up to KERN_DEBUG on a pile of
machines you want to take a closer look at. The 'kernel.printk' global
loglevel is also already changable at runtime, and since that setting
interacts with this one it would be strange if only the former were able
to be changed.

I also want to add more attribute knobs related to extended consoles,
so the plumbing to get things exposed in sysfs is worth it for me.

Thanks,
Calvin

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ