[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <01714139-9FE5-4DFF-A299-D758D1871BA0@fb.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2019 19:45:00 +0000
From: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
CC: Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"ast@...nel.org" <ast@...nel.org>,
"daniel@...earbox.net" <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Kernel Team <Kernel-team@...com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"acme@...hat.com" <acme@...hat.com>,
"jolsa@...nel.org" <jolsa@...nel.org>,
"namhyung@...nel.org" <namhyung@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 perf,bpf 12/15] perf, bpf: enable annotation of bpf
program
> On Mar 4, 2019, at 5:53 AM, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 09:06:40PM -0800, Song Liu wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
>> + fflush(s);
>> + do {
>> + const struct bpf_line_info *linfo = NULL;
>> + struct disasm_line *dl;
>> + size_t prev_buf_size;
>> + const char *srcline;
>> + u64 addr;
>> +
>> + addr = pc + ((u64 *)(info_linear->info.jited_ksyms))[sub_id];
>> + count = disassemble(pc, &info);
>> +
>> + if (prog_linfo)
>> + linfo = bpf_prog_linfo__lfind_addr_func(prog_linfo,
>> + addr, sub_id,
>> + nr_skip);
>> +
>> + if (linfo && btf) {
>> + srcline = btf__name_by_offset(btf, linfo->line_off);
>> + nr_skip++;
>> + } else
>> + srcline = NULL;
>> +
>> + fprintf(s, "\n");
>> + prev_buf_size = buf_size;
>> + fflush(s);
>> +
>> + if (!opts->hide_src_code && srcline) {
>> + args->offset = -1;
>
> why's the offset not needed in here?
This is the source code line. Based on my understanding of annotation
code, we put -1 for source code line. Did I misunderstand something?
Thanks,
Song
>
> jirka
>
>> + args->line = strdup(srcline);
>> + args->line_nr = 0;
>> + args->ms.sym = sym;
>> + dl = disasm_line__new(args);
>> + if (dl) {
>> + annotation_line__add(&dl->al,
>> + ¬es->src->source);
>> + }
>> + }
>
> SNIP
Powered by blists - more mailing lists