lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 4 Mar 2019 19:45:00 +0000
From:   Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
To:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
CC:     Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "ast@...nel.org" <ast@...nel.org>,
        "daniel@...earbox.net" <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Kernel Team <Kernel-team@...com>,
        "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "acme@...hat.com" <acme@...hat.com>,
        "jolsa@...nel.org" <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        "namhyung@...nel.org" <namhyung@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 perf,bpf 12/15] perf, bpf: enable annotation of bpf
 program



> On Mar 4, 2019, at 5:53 AM, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 09:06:40PM -0800, Song Liu wrote:
> 
> SNIP
> 
>> +	fflush(s);
>> +	do {
>> +		const struct bpf_line_info *linfo = NULL;
>> +		struct disasm_line *dl;
>> +		size_t prev_buf_size;
>> +		const char *srcline;
>> +		u64 addr;
>> +
>> +		addr = pc + ((u64 *)(info_linear->info.jited_ksyms))[sub_id];
>> +		count = disassemble(pc, &info);
>> +
>> +		if (prog_linfo)
>> +			linfo = bpf_prog_linfo__lfind_addr_func(prog_linfo,
>> +								addr, sub_id,
>> +								nr_skip);
>> +
>> +		if (linfo && btf) {
>> +			srcline = btf__name_by_offset(btf, linfo->line_off);
>> +			nr_skip++;
>> +		} else
>> +			srcline = NULL;
>> +
>> +		fprintf(s, "\n");
>> +		prev_buf_size = buf_size;
>> +		fflush(s);
>> +
>> +		if (!opts->hide_src_code && srcline) {
>> +			args->offset = -1;
> 
> why's the offset not needed in here?

This is the source code line. Based on my understanding of annotation
code, we put -1 for source code line. Did I misunderstand something?

Thanks,
Song

> 
> jirka
> 
>> +			args->line = strdup(srcline);
>> +			args->line_nr = 0;
>> +			args->ms.sym  = sym;
>> +			dl = disasm_line__new(args);
>> +			if (dl) {
>> +				annotation_line__add(&dl->al,
>> +						     &notes->src->source);
>> +			}
>> +		}
> 
> SNIP

Powered by blists - more mailing lists