lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ec4e92fa787a7db1caf39920a62c3721849baee9.camel@intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 05 Mar 2019 08:43:53 +0200
From:   Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@...el.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
        Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com>,
        Intel Linux Wireless <linuxwifi@...el.com>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     Avraham Stern <avraham.stern@...el.com>,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iwlwifi: fix 64-bit division

Hi Arnd,

On Mon, 2019-03-04 at 21:38 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> do_div() expects unsigned operands and otherwise triggers a warning
> like:
> 
> drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/ftm-initiator.c:465:2: error:
> comparison of distinct pointer types ('typeof ((rtt_avg)) *' (aka
> 'long long *') and 'uint64_t *' (aka 'unsigned long long *')) [-
> Werror,-Wcompare-distinct-pointer-types]
>         do_div(rtt_avg, 6666);
>         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/asm-generic/div64.h:222:28: note: expanded from macro
> 'do_div'
>         (void)(((typeof((n)) *)0) == ((uint64_t *)0));  \
>                ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 1 error generated.
> 
> Change the do_div() to the simpler div_s64() that can handle
> negative inputs correctly.
> 
> Fixes: 937b10c0de68 ("iwlwifi: mvm: add debug prints for FTM")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> ---

This was already fixed with this patch:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10823267/

...but it hasn't reached the mainline yet.

I'm planning to send it to the v5.1-rc series as soon as the merge
window closes.  Is that quick enough for you?

--
Cheers,
Luca.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ