lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 5 Mar 2019 11:55:49 +0200
From:   Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To:     Tony Jones <tonyj@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     acme@...nel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
        Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>,
        Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>,
        Seeteena Thoufeek <s1seetee@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] perf script python: add Python3 support

On 2/03/19 3:18 AM, Tony Jones wrote:
> This is v2 of my version of the patchset.  Incorporating the 
> previous feedback.  Some changes from v1 were already merged.
> 
> Patch 1/7 deals with the existing inconsistent indentation.
> Indentation is now consistent per file but varying styles (tabs,
> 4 spaces and 8 spaces).   
> I will followup at a later date with changes to checkpatch to ensure
> that the syntax per file is maintained.
> 
> Patches 2/7 through 5/7 were sent in v1,  they have been changed 
> to remove the previous indentation changes
> 
> Patch 6/7 was sent in v1.  I had previously *not* been able to test 
> export-to-postgresql.py.  I was able to do so this time and found
> that more changes were needed.    The author of the original code
> seems concerned about code-style so I would suggest you only merge 
> with his explicit ACK.
> 
> Patch 7/7 was not in v1, it cleans up some repeated use of date
> functions in the SQL exporters.  It is not mandatory for Python3
> support.  It is dependent on Patch#6.
> 
> I hope I've got everything correct, I've retested until I feel I 
> can't look at Python code anymore for a while :-). Hopefully I've 
> not made any more mistakes.  If I have, please LMK and I'll do v3.

perf tools link against python2 so have the scripts been tested with python3?

$ ldd tools/perf/perf | grep python
        libpython2.7.so.1.0 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0
(0x00007ff8a2de2000)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ