[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2924036.MijKVBYPyq@aspire.rjw.lan>
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2019 11:37:18 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>,
Gabriele Mazzotta <gabriele.mzt@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/3] cpufreq: Add cpufreq_cpu_acquire() and cpufreq_cpu_release()
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
It sometimes is necessary to find a cpufreq policy for a given CPU
and acquire its rwsem (for writing) immediately after that, so
introduce cpufreq_cpu_acquire() as a helper for that and the
complementary cpufreq_cpu_release().
Make cpufreq_update_policy() use the new functions.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
-> v2: New patch.
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -256,6 +256,51 @@ void cpufreq_cpu_put(struct cpufreq_poli
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_cpu_put);
+/**
+ * cpufreq_cpu_release - Unlock a policy and decrement its usage counter.
+ * @policy: cpufreq policy returned by cpufreq_cpu_acquire().
+ */
+static void cpufreq_cpu_release(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
+{
+ if (WARN_ON(!policy))
+ return;
+
+ lockdep_assert_held(&policy->rwsem);
+
+ up_write(&policy->rwsem);
+
+ cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
+}
+
+/**
+ * cpufreq_cpu_acquire - Find policy for a CPU, mark it as busy and lock it.
+ * @cpu: CPU to find the policy for.
+ *
+ * Call cpufreq_cpu_get() to get a reference on the cpufreq policy for @cpu and
+ * if the policy returned by it is not NULL, acquire its rwsem for writing.
+ * Return the policy if it is active or release it and return NULL otherwise.
+ *
+ * The policy returned by this function has to be released with the help of
+ * cpufreq_cpu_release() in order to release its rwsem and balance its usage
+ * counter properly.
+ */
+static struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_cpu_acquire(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
+
+ if (!policy)
+ return NULL;
+
+ down_write(&policy->rwsem);
+
+ if (policy_is_inactive(policy)) {
+ cpufreq_cpu_release(policy);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ return policy;
+}
+
/*********************************************************************
* EXTERNALLY AFFECTING FREQUENCY CHANGES *
*********************************************************************/
@@ -2343,17 +2388,12 @@ static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpu
*/
void cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu)
{
- struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
+ struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_acquire(cpu);
struct cpufreq_policy new_policy;
if (!policy)
return;
- down_write(&policy->rwsem);
-
- if (policy_is_inactive(policy))
- goto unlock;
-
/*
* BIOS might change freq behind our back
* -> ask driver for current freq and notify governors about a change
@@ -2370,9 +2410,7 @@ void cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int
cpufreq_set_policy(policy, &new_policy);
unlock:
- up_write(&policy->rwsem);
-
- cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
+ cpufreq_cpu_release(policy);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpufreq_update_policy);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists