[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190305005338.GK8613@ziepe.ca>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2019 20:53:38 -0400
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Artemy Kovalyov <artemyko@...lanox.com>,
"john.hubbard@...il.com" <john.hubbard@...il.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] RDMA/umem: minor bug fix and cleanup in error
handling paths
On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 03:11:05PM -0800, John Hubbard wrote:
> get_user_page(): increments page->_refcount by a large amount (1024)
>
> put_user_page(): decrements page->_refcount by a large amount (1024)
>
> ...and just stop doing the odd (to me) technique of incrementing once for
> each tail page. I cannot see any reason why that's actually required, as
> opposed to just "raise the page->_refcount enough to avoid losing the head
> page too soon".
I'd very much like to see this in the infiniband umem code - the extra
work and cost of touching every page in a huge page is very much
undesired.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists