[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190305122631.GK16615@krava>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 13:26:31 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/10] perf record: implement -z,--compression_level=n
option and compression
On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 06:58:32PM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
SNIP
>
> +static size_t record__process_comp_header(void *record, size_t increment)
> +{
> + struct compressed_event *event = record;
> + size_t size = sizeof(struct compressed_event);
> +
> + if (increment) {
> + event->header.size += increment;
> + return increment;
> + } else {
> + event->header.type = PERF_RECORD_COMPRESSED;
> + event->header.size = size;
> + return size;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static size_t record__zstd_compress(void *data, void *dst, size_t dst_size,
we use the <name>__ to mark 'struct' related function,
which supposed to be the first argument.. IMO zstd_compress
will be fine in here
jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists