lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190305173111.t3n6ycktht7kxuhq@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date:   Tue, 5 Mar 2019 17:31:12 +0000
From:   Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
        Peng Hao <peng.hao2@....com.cn>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Smarter Kconfig help

Guys,

We need to be smarter when writing Kconfig help.  I'm just going
through updating my build trees with the results of 5.0 development,
and a number of the help texts are next to useless.  For example,

PVPANIC - is this something that should be enabled for a host or
guest kernel?  Answer: you have to read the driver code to find out.

IMX_IRQSTEER - which i.MX SoCs does this apply to?  The help text
just says:

  "Support for the i.MX IRQSTEER interrupt multiplexer/remapper."

which doesn't say which SoCs this should be enabled for - it turns
out that grepping for the driver's DT compatible string, none of
the 32-bit ARM cores have support for this, yet we still default
it to enabled there.  It seems the help text should at the very
least tell the user that this is not applicable to i.MX SoCs with
32-bit ARM cores.

I'm sure there's many other instances of this... I suspect that
it's caused by review concentrating mostly on the technical aspects
of the code and the Kconfig help text just gets forgotten about.

Can we at least improve these two options please?

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ