linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] fs: Make splice() and tee() take into account O

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190304205401.0823f3f7@gandalf.local.home>
Date:   Mon, 4 Mar 2019 20:54:01 -0500
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Slavomir Kaslev <kaslevs@...are.com>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] fs: Make splice() and tee() take into account
 O_NONBLOCK flag on pipes


[ Replying again, but without Cc'ing Trump due to a bug in claws-mail ]

On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 16:09:22 -0800
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> 
> Note that the "arguably buggy" argument is not an actual real argument

Note that "arguably buggy" just means that you can argue that it is
buggy. It doesn't actually mean that it *is* buggy ;-)

-- Steve