[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <e889a254-ec7e-49f5-bdb0-1d8d8a9063a6@www.fastmail.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2019 19:00:05 -0500
From: "Andrew Jeffery" <andrew@...id.au>
To: "Eddie James" <eajames@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: "Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@....com>,
DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"OpenBMC Maillist" <openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] drivers/misc: Add Aspeed XDMA engine driver
On Wed, 6 Mar 2019, at 08:15, Eddie James wrote:
>
> On 3/5/19 2:01 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 10:37 PM Eddie James <eajames@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> >> The XDMA engine embedded in the AST2500 SOC performs PCI DMA operations
> >> between the SOC (acting as a BMC) and a host processor in a server.
> >>
> >> This commit adds a driver to control the XDMA engine and adds functions
> >> to initialize the hardware and memory and start DMA operations.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Eddie James <eajames@...ux.ibm.com>
> > Hi Eddie,
> >
> > Thanks for your submission! Overall this looks well-implemented, but
> > I fear we already have too many ways of doing the same thing at
> > the moment, and I would hope to avoid adding yet another user space
> > interface for a specific hardware that does this.
> >
> > Your interface appears to be a fairly low-level variant, just doing
> > single DMA transfers through ioctls, but configuring the PCIe
> > endpoint over sysfs.
>
> Hi, thanks for the quick response!
>
> There is actually no PCIe configuration done in this driver. The two
> sysfs entries control the system control unit (SCU) on the AST2500
> purely to enable and disable entire PCIe devices. It might be possible
> to control those devices more finely with a PCI endpoint driver, but
> there is no need to do so. The XDMA engine does that by itself to
> perform DMA fairly automatically.
I had a series a while back to expose random bits from devices in sysfs. It got
shot down pretty well, but the main contention was over the devicetree
bindings.
I think we could revive it as a library-type thing that drivers can use to expose
bits like what you're describing without putting the grubby details in the
devicetree. The we would have a consistent approach to exposing otherwise
hard to describe functions (which is what a lot of a BMC turns out to be).
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists