linux-kernel - Re: False positive "do_IRQ: #.55 No irq handler for vector" messages on AMD ryzen based laptops

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e8d1128f-ff81-3dc9-90ae-86ce5d8f69b2@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 6 Mar 2019 09:41:23 +0100
From:   Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     "Lendacky, Thomas" <Thomas.Lendacky@....com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: Re: False positive "do_IRQ: #.55 No irq handler for vector" messages
 on AMD ryzen based laptops

Hi,

On 05-03-19 20:54, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 08:40:02PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Finger pointing at the firmware if there are multiple vendors involved
>> is really not going to help here. Esp. since most OEMs will just respond
>> with "the machine works fine with Windows"
> 
> Yes, because windoze simply doesn't report that spurious IRQ, most
> likely.

So maybe we need to lower the priority of the do_IRQ error from pr_emerg
to pr_err then ?  That will stop throwing the errors in the users face each
boot on distros which have chosen to set the quiet loglevel to such a level
that pr_err messages are not shown on the console (*).

Regards,

Hans

*) Since there are simply too much false-positive pr_err messages in the kernel,
try e.g. plugging in a usb-stick and then do "dmesg -level=err"
Note the messages will still be in dmesg and in the system logs