linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: allwinner: a64: Add Oceanic A64-5inMFD initial support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 6 Mar 2019 15:06:00 +0530
From:   Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>
To:     Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>
Cc:     Ryan Pannell <ryan@...kl.com>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Michael Trimarchi <michael@...rulasolutions.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-amarula@...rulasolutions.com" 
        <linux-amarula@...rulasolutions.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: allwinner: a64: Add Oceanic A64-5inMFD initial support

On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 2:57 PM Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 04:35:04PM +0000, Ryan Pannell wrote:
> > We don't mind if it has to be:
> > compatible = "oceanic,5inmfd", "allwinner,sun50i-a64";
> >
> > However, to avoid confusion, might it be worth including the part number (We list this as '5205 5" MFD') so this would become:
> > compatible = "oceanic,5205-5inmfd", "allwinner,sun50i-a64";
> >
> > Perhaps this solves the issue. Please let me know thoughts.
>
> Yep, that works for me

A64 instead of part-number 5205 seems less confused isn't it? or we
need to give more priority with real hardware definition?