linux-kernel - Re: a.out coredumping: fix or delete?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1903061323030.1646@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date:   Wed, 6 Mar 2019 13:25:17 +0100 (CET)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
cc:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
        Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: a.out coredumping: fix or delete?

On Tue, 5 Mar 2019, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 10:19:04AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 02, 2019 at 12:57:30AM +0100, Jann Horn wrote:
> > > In theory, Linux can dump cores for a.out binaries. In practice, that
> > > code is pretty bitrotten and buggy. Does anyone want that code so much
> > > that they'd like to fix it, or can we just delete it?
> > 
> > I was asking myself the same question while doing
> > 
> >   10970e1b4be9 ("x86/a.out: Clear the dump structure initially")
> > 
> > especially since it is kinda hard to get the toolchain to even create an
> > a.out executable - your script to create one case-in-point.
> 
> It's been 25 years since Linux added support for ELF.  Can we just
> delete the a.out support entirely now?  According to the Linux-ELF HOWTO,
> support was added in 1.1.52 (August 1994).  It's pretty much necromancy
> at this point.

The Kernel-Necrophilia cult members might disagree. :)

But yes, good riddance.

Thanks,

	tglx