[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <df01bf6e-84a1-53fb-bf0c-0957af2f79e1@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2019 18:15:25 +0530
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Michal Suchánek <msuchanek@...e.de>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, Oliver <oohall@...il.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Ross Zwisler <zwisler@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm/dax: Don't enable huge dax mapping by default
On 3/6/19 5:14 PM, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Mar 2019 14:47:33 +0530
> "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> writes:
>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 1:40 AM Oliver <oohall@...il.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 7:35 PM Aneesh Kumar K.V
>>>> <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> Also even if the user decided to not use THP, by
>> echo "never" > transparent_hugepage/enabled , we should continue to map
>> dax fault using huge page on platforms that can support huge pages.
>
> Is this a good idea?
>
> This knob is there for a reason. In some situations having huge pages
> can severely impact performance of the system (due to host-guest
> interaction or whatever) and the ability to really turn off all THP
> would be important in those cases, right?
>
My understanding was that is not true for dax pages? These are not
regular memory that got allocated. They are allocated out of /dev/dax/
or /dev/pmem*. Do we have a reason not to use hugepages for mapping
pages in that case?
-aneesh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists