[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1f922d79-0057-ed80-305c-01768dd40cad@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 18:04:35 -0800
From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
CC: Artemy Kovalyov <artemyko@...lanox.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
"john.hubbard@...il.com" <john.hubbard@...il.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] RDMA/umem: minor bug fix and cleanup in error handling
paths
On 3/5/19 5:51 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 05:37:18PM -0800, John Hubbard wrote:
>> On 3/5/19 5:34 PM, John Hubbard wrote:
>> [snip]
>>>>> So release_pages(&local_page_list[j+1], npages - j-1) would be correct.
>>>>
>>>> Someone send a fixup patch please...
>>>>
>>>> Jason
>>>
>>> Yeah, I'm on it. Just need to double-check that this is the case. But Jason,
>>> you're confirming it already, so that helps too.
>
> I didn't look, just assuming Artemy is right since he knows this
> code..
>
OK. And I've confirmed it, too.
>>> Patch coming shortly.
>>>
>>
>> Jason, btw, do you prefer a patch that fixes the previous one, or a new
>> patch that stands alone? (I'm not sure how this tree is maintained, exactly.)
>
> It has past the point when I should apply a fixup, rdma is general has
> about an approximately 1 day period after the 'thanks applied' message
> where rebase is possible
>
> Otherwise the tree is strictly no rebase
>
> Jason
>
Got it, patch is posted now.
thanks,
--
John Hubbard
NVIDIA
Powered by blists - more mailing lists