[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <10106.1551892803@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2019 17:20:03 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Christian Kujau <lists@...dbynature.de>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com>,
Steve Dickson <steved@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: FS-Cache: Duplicate cookie detected
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
> > FS-Cache: Duplicate cookie detected
> > FS-Cache: O-cookie c=000000009da9dbf0 [p=000000001593f904 fl=222 nc=0 na=1]
> > FS-Cache: O-cookie d=00000000287febd9 n=00000000980c9e8a
> > FS-Cache: O-key=[8] '020001bdc0a80064'
> > FS-Cache: N-cookie c=00000000bfe3f869 [p=000000001593f904 fl=2 nc=0 na=1]
> > FS-Cache: N-cookie d=00000000287febd9 n=00000000e153f178
> > FS-Cache: N-key=[8] '020001bdc0a80064'
>
> I've just spotted something that all these things have in common. The old
> cookie has FSCACHE_COOKIE_RELINQUISHING set in the flags (fl=222). I don't
> have a wait for this situation in fscache - which I should.
I take it back - 0x200 is FSCACHE_COOKIE_ACQUIRED. :-/
I can reproduce a slightly different problem by setting off ~6000 parallel
processes, each reading its own individual directory of files.
I also see reports like this:
FS-Cache: Duplicate cookie detected
FS-Cache: O-cookie c=00000000db33ad59 [p=000000004bc53500 fl=218 nc=0 na=0]
FS-Cache: O-cookie d= (null) n= (null)
FS-Cache: O-cookie o=000000006cf6db4f
FS-Cache: O-key=[16] '0100010101000000e51fc6000323ae02'
FS-Cache: N-cookie c=00000000791c49d0 [p=000000004bc53500 fl=2 nc=0 na=1]
FS-Cache: N-cookie d=00000000e220fe14 n=00000000d4484489
FS-Cache: N-key=[16] '0100010101000000e51fc6000323ae02'
with no cookie def or netfs data and flags ACQUIRED, RELINQUISHED and
INVALIDATING - which I can insert a wait for.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists