lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 6 Mar 2019 09:26:08 -0800
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <>
Cc:     Akira Yokosawa <>, Borislav Petkov <>,
        Andrea Parri <>,,,
        Alan Stern <>,
        Will Deacon <>,
        Boqun Feng <>,
        Nicholas Piggin <>,
        David Howells <>,
        Jade Alglave <>,
        Luc Maranget <>,
        Daniel Lustig <>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] tools/memory-model: Remove (dep ; rfi) from ppo

On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 05:58:31PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 12:46:05AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> > So, I'm looking at the macro RELOC_HIDE() defined in include/linux/compiler-gcc.h.
> > Am I the only one who was not aware of this gcc-specific macro?
> It's one I regularly see, but had forgotten about in this context.
> However; you can also fix things by adding asm volatile ("":::"memory");
> in places.
> But that's not really the point; I would really rather have a cmdline
> knob to fix things. That way we can compile the kernel with and without
> and look for differences. -fno-unicorns or something :-)
> While I understand some compiler people revel in UB and love to make
> unicorns happen, I think in this case the produces result is utterly
> insane.

Because I couldn't resist...

							Thanx, Paul

Powered by blists - more mailing lists