| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2019 12:32:53 -0600
From: "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@...com>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
CC: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Liam Mark <lmark@...eaurora.org>,
Brian Starkey <Brian.Starkey@....com>,
Chenbo Feng <fengc@...gle.com>,
Alistair Strachan <astrachan@...gle.com>,
ML dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/5 v2] kselftests: Add dma-heap test
On 3/6/19 12:19 PM, John Stultz wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 10:15 AM Andrew F. Davis <afd@...com> wrote:
>>
>> On 3/6/19 10:14 AM, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
>>> Le mar. 5 mars 2019 à 21:54, John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org> a écrit :
>>>>
>>>> Add very trivial allocation test for dma-heaps.
>>>>
>>>> TODO: Need to actually do some validation on
>>>> the returned dma-buf.
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
>>>> Cc: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org>
>>>> Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
>>>> Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>
>>>> Cc: Liam Mark <lmark@...eaurora.org>
>>>> Cc: Brian Starkey <Brian.Starkey@....com>
>>>> Cc: Andrew F. Davis <afd@...com>
>>>> Cc: Chenbo Feng <fengc@...gle.com>
>>>> Cc: Alistair Strachan <astrachan@...gle.com>
>>>> Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
>>>> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
>>>> ---
>>>> v2: Switched to use reworked dma-heap apis
>>>> ---
>>>> tools/testing/selftests/dmabuf-heaps/Makefile | 11 +++
>>>> tools/testing/selftests/dmabuf-heaps/dmabuf-heap.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 2 files changed, 107 insertions(+)
>>>> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/dmabuf-heaps/Makefile
>>>> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/dmabuf-heaps/dmabuf-heap.c
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/dmabuf-heaps/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/dmabuf-heaps/Makefile
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 0000000..c414ad3
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/dmabuf-heaps/Makefile
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
>>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>>>> +CFLAGS += -static -O3 -Wl,-no-as-needed -Wall
>>>> +#LDLIBS += -lrt -lpthread -lm
>>>> +
>>>> +# these are all "safe" tests that don't modify
>>>> +# system time or require escalated privileges
>>>> +TEST_GEN_PROGS = dmabuf-heap
>>>> +
>>>> +
>>>> +include ../lib.mk
>>>> +
>>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/dmabuf-heaps/dmabuf-heap.c b/tools/testing/selftests/dmabuf-heaps/dmabuf-heap.c
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 0000000..06837a4
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/dmabuf-heaps/dmabuf-heap.c
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
>>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>>>> +
>>>> +#include <dirent.h>
>>>> +#include <errno.h>
>>>> +#include <fcntl.h>
>>>> +#include <stdio.h>
>>>> +#include <string.h>
>>>> +#include <unistd.h>
>>>> +#include <sys/ioctl.h>
>>>> +#include <sys/mman.h>
>>>> +#include <sys/types.h>
>>>> +
>>>> +#include "../../../../include/uapi/linux/dma-heap.h"
>>>> +
>>>> +#define DEVPATH "/dev/dma_heap"
>>>> +
>>>> +int dmabuf_heap_open(char *name)
>>>> +{
>>>> + int ret, fd;
>>>> + char buf[256];
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = sprintf(buf, "%s/%s", DEVPATH, name);
>>>> + if (ret < 0) {
>>>> + printf("sprintf failed!\n");
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + fd = open(buf, O_RDWR);
>>>> + if (fd < 0)
>>>> + printf("open %s failed!\n", buf);
>>>> + return fd;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +int dmabuf_heap_alloc(int fd, size_t len, unsigned int flags, int *dmabuf_fd)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct dma_heap_allocation_data data = {
>>>> + .len = len,
>>>> + .flags = flags,
>>>> + };
>>>> + int ret;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (dmabuf_fd == NULL)
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = ioctl(fd, DMA_HEAP_IOC_ALLOC, &data);
>>>> + if (ret < 0)
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> + *dmabuf_fd = (int)data.fd;
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +#define ONE_MEG (1024*1024)
>>>> +
>>>> +void do_test(char *heap_name)
>>>> +{
>>>> + int heap_fd = -1, dmabuf_fd = -1;
>>>> + int ret;
>>>> +
>>>> + printf("Testing heap: %s\n", heap_name);
>>>> +
>>>> + heap_fd = dmabuf_heap_open(heap_name);
>>>> + if (heap_fd < 0)
>>>> + return;
>>>> +
>>>> + printf("Allocating 1 MEG\n");
>>>> + ret = dmabuf_heap_alloc(heap_fd, ONE_MEG, 0, &dmabuf_fd);
>>>> + if (ret)
>>>> + goto out;
>>>> +
>>>> + /* DO SOMETHING WITH THE DMABUF HERE? */
>>>
>>> You can do a call to mmap and write a pattern in the buffer.
>>>
>>
>> mmap is optional for DMA-BUFs, only attach/map are required. To test
>> those we would need a dummy device, so a test kernel module may be
>> needed to really exercise this.
>>
>> I have one I use for ION buffer testing, it consumes a DMA-BUF passed
>> from userspace, attach/maps it to a dummy device then return the
>> physical address of the first page of the buffer for validation. Might
>> be a good test, but dummy devices don't always have the proper dma
>> attributes set like a real device does, so it may also fail for some
>> otherwise valid buffers.
>
> Cool! Do you mind sharing that? I might try to rework and integrate it
> into this patchset?
>
Sure, top two patches here:
> https://git.ti.com/ti-analog-linux-kernel/afd-analog/commits/dma-buf-to-phys
Andrew
> thanks
> -john
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists