linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] ntp: Avoid undefined behaviour in second

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 6 Mar 2019 21:10:03 -0800
From:   Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@...wei.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ntp: Avoid undefined behaviour in second_overflow()

On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 02:37:21PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> 
> There is also y2070 (many RTCs), y2100 (some other RTCs, especially
> those that assume it's a leap year), and y2106.

That's okay, Arnd.  When the time comes you can come out of retirement
and cash in, doing Y2.07, Y2.1, and Y2.106K consulting  ;^}

Cheers,
Richard