[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ffeec8ab-eac9-360f-55b5-92082d28e232@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2019 11:26:06 +0300
From: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/10] perf record: implement -z,--compression_level=n
option and compression
On 05.03.2019 15:25, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 06:58:32PM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
>> +static size_t record__zstd_compress(void *data, void *dst, size_t dst_size,
>> + void *src, size_t src_size)
>> +{
>> + size_t compressed;
>> + struct perf_session *session = data;
>> + /* maximum size of record data size (2^16 - 1 - header) */
>> + const size_t max_record_size = (1 << 8 * sizeof(u16)) -
>
> I dont follow this calculation, could you just use PERF_SAMPLE_MAX_SIZE?
in v7.
~Alexey
>
> jirka
>
>> + 1 - sizeof(struct compressed_event);
>> +
>
> SNIP
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists