[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190307103557.1688556-1-arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2019 11:35:50 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: omap2: remove incorrect __init annotation
omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup() is marked __init, but its caller is not, so
we get a warning with clang-8:
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x343c8): Section mismatch in reference from the function omap3xxx_prm_late_init() to the function .init.text:omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup()
The function omap3xxx_prm_late_init() references
the function __init omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup().
This is often because omap3xxx_prm_late_init lacks a __init
annotation or the annotation of omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup is wrong.
When building with gcc, omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup() is always
inlined, so we never noticed in the past.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c
index 05858f966f7d..dfa65fc2c82b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm3xxx.c
@@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ static void omap3_prm_reconfigure_io_chain(void)
* registers, and omap3xxx_prm_reconfigure_io_chain() must be called.
* No return value.
*/
-static void __init omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup(void)
+static void omap3xxx_prm_enable_io_wakeup(void)
{
if (prm_features & PRM_HAS_IO_WAKEUP)
omap2_prm_set_mod_reg_bits(OMAP3430_EN_IO_MASK, WKUP_MOD,
--
2.20.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists