linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 05/20] x86/uaccess/xen: Suppress SMAP warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190307123200.GE32477@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Thu, 7 Mar 2019 13:32:00 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
Cc:     torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com,
        julien.thierry@....com, will.deacon@....com, luto@...capital.net,
        mingo@...nel.org, catalin.marinas@....com, james.morse@....com,
        valentin.schneider@....com, brgerst@...il.com, jpoimboe@...hat.com,
        luto@...nel.org, bp@...en8.de, dvlasenk@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dvyukov@...gle.com,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, andrew.cooper3@...rix.com,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
        Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/20] x86/uaccess/xen: Suppress SMAP warnings

On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 01:22:52PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 07/03/2019 12:45, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > drivers/xen/privcmd.o: warning: objtool: privcmd_ioctl()+0x1414: call to hypercall_page() with UACCESS enabled
> > 
> > Xen needs to do HV calls with AC=1 for hysterical raisins. Make the
> > warning go away.
> 
> No, this is a hypercall with parameters passed through from user land
> (Xen tools). So setting AC=1 is not related to hysterical reasons, but
> to indicate that unprivileged buffers are okay here. So please change
> the commit message to something like:
> 
> Some Xen hypercalls allow parameter buffers in user land, so they need
> to set AC=1. Avoid the warning for those cases.

*yuck* that's gross...

And I understood from Andrew yesterday (but perhaps I misunderstood)
that the whole privcmd thing was a bit of a hack.

But sure, I'll change the message.

> > XXX: arguably we should rename ANNOTATE_NOSPEC_ALTERNATIVE to
> >      ANNOTATE_IGNORE_ALTERNATIVE.
> > 
> > Cc: andrew.cooper3@...rix.com
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> 
> Mind Cc-ing the maintainers of the code you are touching in future
> patches?

Sure; my bad, I forgot to ask get_maintainers about this.