[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL1p7m71U4pcbuBTqQ3qMoa4Y2tYJPQ52qQraSBHLu-SrzzYwA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2019 09:44:39 -0500
From: Joel Savitz <jsavitz@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, trivial@...nel.org,
Philip Auld <pauld@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: fix spelling of active in comment on is_cpu_allowed()
Best,
Joel Savitz
On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 8:13 PM Joel Savitz <jsavitz@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> trivial fix of documentation typo
>
> Signed-off-by: Joel Savitz <jsavitz@...hat.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/core.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index ead464a..2e2e19b 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -920,7 +920,7 @@ static inline bool is_per_cpu_kthread(struct task_struct *p)
> }
>
> /*
> - * Per-CPU kthreads are allowed to run on !actie && online CPUs, see
> + * Per-CPU kthreads are allowed to run on !active && online CPUs, see
> * __set_cpus_allowed_ptr() and select_fallback_rq().
> */
> static inline bool is_cpu_allowed(struct task_struct *p, int cpu)
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists