[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190307144552.GC19434@e105550-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2019 14:45:52 +0000
From: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>
To: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/14] cpu topology: Export die_id
Hi Len,
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 01:20:03AM -0500, Len Brown wrote:
> From: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
>
> Export die_id in cpu topology, for the benefit of hardware that
> has multiple-die/package.
>
> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
> Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
> ---
> Documentation/cputopology.txt | 6 ++++++
> arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h | 1 +
> drivers/base/topology.c | 4 ++++
> include/linux/topology.h | 3 +++
> 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/cputopology.txt b/Documentation/cputopology.txt
> index cb61277e2308..4e6be7f68fd8 100644
> --- a/Documentation/cputopology.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/cputopology.txt
> @@ -12,6 +12,12 @@ physical_package_id:
> socket number, but the actual value is architecture and platform
> dependent.
>
> +die_id:
> +
> + the CPU die ID of cpuX. Typically it is the hardware platform's
> + identifier (rather than the kernel's). The actual value is
> + architecture and platform dependent.
> +
> core_id:
Can we add the details about die_id further down in cputopology.txt as
well?
diff --git a/Documentation/cputopology.txt b/Documentation/cputopology.txt
index 6c25ce682c90..77b65583081e 100644
--- a/Documentation/cputopology.txt
+++ b/Documentation/cputopology.txt
@@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ For an architecture to support this feature, it must define some of
these macros in include/asm-XXX/topology.h::
#define topology_physical_package_id(cpu)
+ #define topology_die_id(cpu)
#define topology_core_id(cpu)
#define topology_book_id(cpu)
#define topology_drawer_id(cpu)
@@ -116,10 +117,11 @@ provides default definitions for any of the above macros that are
not defined by include/asm-XXX/topology.h:
1) topology_physical_package_id: -1
-2) topology_core_id: 0
-3) topology_sibling_cpumask: just the given CPU
-4) topology_core_cpumask: just the given CPU
-5) topology_die_cpumask: just the given CPU
+2) topology_die_id: -1
+3) topology_core_id: 0
+4) topology_sibling_cpumask: just the given CPU
+5) topology_core_cpumask: just the given CPU
+6) topology_die_cpumask: just the given CPU
>
> the CPU core ID of cpuX. Typically it is the hardware platform's
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h
> index 453cf38a1c33..281be6bbc80d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h
> @@ -106,6 +106,7 @@ extern const struct cpumask *cpu_coregroup_mask(int cpu);
>
> #define topology_logical_package_id(cpu) (cpu_data(cpu).logical_proc_id)
> #define topology_physical_package_id(cpu) (cpu_data(cpu).phys_proc_id)
> +#define topology_die_id(cpu) (cpu_data(cpu).cpu_die_id)
> #define topology_core_id(cpu) (cpu_data(cpu).cpu_core_id)
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
The above is x86 specific and seems to fit better with the next patch in
the series.
Morten
Powered by blists - more mailing lists