[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190307173810.GI32477@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2019 18:38:10 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>, valentin.schneider@....com,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] objtool: UACCESS validation v3
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 11:17:09AM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 09:00:49AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > But that macro really is the macro from hell regardless.
> >
> > Do people really use CONFIG_PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES?
>
> IIRC, Steven runs it once a year or so...
That's TRACE_BRANCH_PROFILING; PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES I don't know, that
mostly just gets in the way I think.
Also; it seems to me that something PT, or maybe even simply:
perf -e branches -e branch-misses
would get you similar or sufficient information.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists