[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190307204021.GE32534@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2019 21:40:21 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>, valentin.schneider@....com,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/20] objtool: Add UACCESS validation
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 09:23:19PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 07:48:13PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Another thing I need to look at is why objtool only found memset_orig
> > (from __memset) but not memset_erms, which if I read the code right, is
> > a possible alternative there.
>
> Turns out we only look for sibling calls in the original instruction
> stream, not in any alternatives; which in general seems like a fair
> enough assumption.
And while I'm looking at memset_64.S, why are memset_erms and
memset_orig global functions? At the very least they should be local,
and ideally not even functions.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists