[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNAQzfiZejYKKtFSineEwB5M_GcUktBmLgAGs2iC7i4Cbfw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2019 15:42:49 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Cc: Manoj Srivastava <manoj.srivastava.1962@...il.com>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
Liz Zhang <lizzha@...rosoft.com>,
Lili Deng <v-lide@...rosoft.com>,
Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@...aro.org>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: add workaround for Debian make-kpkg
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 6:56 AM Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2019-03-06 at 22:48 -0800, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Does this have any users?
Recently, I received a regression report.
So, yes. There are users.
> > I can take a stand at making it work, but I am
> > unsure of there are enough people interested in make-kpkg anymore to make
> > it worthwhile.
> >
> > There is a man pager that might be of minor interest, but that can be
> > taken over by the kernel team if they want
I do not want to maintain the dying package.
> [...]
>
> I assume you're referring to kernel-img.conf. I would be happy to add
> that to linux-base, with some clarification of which settings are
> understood by which packages.
>
> I take it that you don't want kernel-package to be included in buster,
> so can you open an RC bug to say so?
Also, could you make sure it won't come back to bullseye or later ?
How about Ubuntu? Is it out of your control?
> Ben.
>
> --
> Ben Hutchings
> friends: People who know you well, but like you anyway.
>
>
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists