[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFrKkmzrH++g88JLxbLkJh3iTUXfjjuxysr0iEigjYA5ig@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2019 10:43:48 +0100
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>,
Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-omap <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"list@....net:IOMMU DRIVERS <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, Joerg
Roedel <joro@...tes.org>," <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: remove block layer bounce buffering for MMC v2
On Fri, 8 Mar 2019 at 10:18, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 02:54:13PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > This looks good to me, however the lack of feedback/tests worries me a
> > bit. So, unless you think it's a bad idea, I intend to apply this when
> > v5.1 rc1 is out, which allows a lengthy test period in linux-next.
>
> Please don't rush to merge this. Based on a talk to some folks I
> have an idea for a sg iterator that can hide the kmapping from
> the drivers, which should allow for some less scary driver code and
> clean this up a bit further.
Okay, I see. Thanks for letting me know!
Kind regards
Uffe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists