[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190308152355.GA20230@lst.de>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2019 16:23:55 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Julien Grall <julien.grall@....com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
"open list:IOMMU DRIVERS" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Revert "swiotlb: remove SWIOTLB_MAP_ERROR"
On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 09:41:46AM +0000, Julien Grall wrote:
> On Xen, dma_addr_t will always be 64-bit while the phys_addr_t will depend
> on the MMU type. So we may have phys_addr_t smaller than dma_addr_t from
> the kernel point of view.
How can dma_addr_t on arm have value > 32-bit when physical
addresses are 32-bit only?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists