lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2019 16:23:55 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> To: Julien Grall <julien.grall@....com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>, "open list:IOMMU DRIVERS" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>, xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Revert "swiotlb: remove SWIOTLB_MAP_ERROR" On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 09:41:46AM +0000, Julien Grall wrote: > On Xen, dma_addr_t will always be 64-bit while the phys_addr_t will depend > on the MMU type. So we may have phys_addr_t smaller than dma_addr_t from > the kernel point of view. How can dma_addr_t on arm have value > 32-bit when physical addresses are 32-bit only?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists