[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190308195141.GF32494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2019 20:51:41 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com,
julien.thierry@....com, will.deacon@....com, luto@...capital.net,
mingo@...nel.org, catalin.marinas@....com, james.morse@....com,
valentin.schneider@....com, brgerst@...il.com, luto@...nel.org,
bp@...en8.de, dvlasenk@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dvyukov@...gle.com, rostedt@...dmis.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/20] objtool: Set insn->func for alternatives
On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 01:16:29PM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 12:45:23PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Make sure we set the function association for alternative instruction
> > sequences; they are after all still part of the function.
>
> Can you also say _why_? I presume it's so the warning messages will be
> saner.
Right; because I'll introduce function attributes later on, so it
becomes important to know what function an instruction belongs to.
I'll update the Changelog.
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> > ---
> > tools/objtool/check.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > --- a/tools/objtool/check.c
> > +++ b/tools/objtool/check.c
> > @@ -695,6 +695,7 @@ static int handle_group_alt(struct objto
> > last_new_insn = insn;
> >
> > insn->ignore = orig_insn->ignore_alts;
> > + insn->func = orig_insn->func;
> >
> > if (insn->type != INSN_JUMP_CONDITIONAL &&
> > insn->type != INSN_JUMP_UNCONDITIONAL)
> >
> >
>
> --
> Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists