linux-kernel - [tip:sched/urgent] sched/fair: Skip LLC NOHZ logic for asymmetric systems

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-ce28d2e53cda890771360d32259495dd6a9c4253@git.kernel.org>
Date:   Sat, 9 Mar 2019 06:38:12 -0800
From:   tip-bot for Valentin Schneider <tipbot@...or.com>
To:     linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     peterz@...radead.org, morten.rasmussen@....com, hpa@...or.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org, bp@...en8.de,
        riel@...riel.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, luto@...nel.org,
        valentin.schneider@....com, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: [tip:sched/urgent] sched/fair: Skip LLC NOHZ logic for asymmetric
 systems

Commit-ID:  ce28d2e53cda890771360d32259495dd6a9c4253
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/ce28d2e53cda890771360d32259495dd6a9c4253
Author:     Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
AuthorDate: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 17:59:46 +0000
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Sat, 9 Mar 2019 14:03:53 +0100

sched/fair: Skip LLC NOHZ logic for asymmetric systems

The LLC NOHZ condition will become true as soon as >=2 CPUs in a
single LLC domain are busy. On big.LITTLE systems, this translates to
two or more CPUs of a "cluster" (big or LITTLE) being busy.

Issuing a NOHZ kick in these conditions isn't desired for asymmetric
systems, as if the busy CPUs can provide enough compute capacity to
the running tasks, then we can leave the NOHZ CPUs in peace.

Skip the LLC NOHZ condition for asymmetric systems, and rely on
nr_running & capacity checks to trigger NOHZ kicks when the system
actually needs them.

Suggested-by: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Dietmar.Eggemann@....com
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: vincent.guittot@...aro.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190211175946.4961-4-valentin.schneider@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index f0d2f8a352bf..51003e1c794d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -9603,24 +9603,6 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(struct rq *rq)
 	}
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
-	sds = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_llc_shared, cpu));
-	if (sds) {
-		/*
-		 * If there is an imbalance between LLC domains (IOW we could
-		 * increase the overall cache use), we need some less-loaded LLC
-		 * domain to pull some load. Likewise, we may need to spread
-		 * load within the current LLC domain (e.g. packed SMT cores but
-		 * other CPUs are idle). We can't really know from here how busy
-		 * the others are - so just get a nohz balance going if it looks
-		 * like this LLC domain has tasks we could move.
-		 */
-		nr_busy = atomic_read(&sds->nr_busy_cpus);
-		if (nr_busy > 1) {
-			flags = NOHZ_KICK_MASK;
-			goto unlock;
-		}
-
-	}
 
 	sd = rcu_dereference(rq->sd);
 	if (sd) {
@@ -9635,6 +9617,21 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(struct rq *rq)
 		}
 	}
 
+	sd = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_asym_packing, cpu));
+	if (sd) {
+		/*
+		 * When ASYM_PACKING; see if there's a more preferred CPU
+		 * currently idle; in which case, kick the ILB to move tasks
+		 * around.
+		 */
+		for_each_cpu_and(i, sched_domain_span(sd), nohz.idle_cpus_mask) {
+			if (sched_asym_prefer(i, cpu)) {
+				flags = NOHZ_KICK_MASK;
+				goto unlock;
+			}
+		}
+	}
+
 	sd = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_asym_cpucapacity, cpu));
 	if (sd) {
 		/*
@@ -9645,20 +9642,32 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(struct rq *rq)
 			flags = NOHZ_KICK_MASK;
 			goto unlock;
 		}
+
+		/*
+		 * For asymmetric systems, we do not want to nicely balance
+		 * cache use, instead we want to embrace asymmetry and only
+		 * ensure tasks have enough CPU capacity.
+		 *
+		 * Skip the LLC logic because it's not relevant in that case.
+		 */
+		goto unlock;
 	}
 
-	sd = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_asym_packing, cpu));
-	if (sd) {
+	sds = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_llc_shared, cpu));
+	if (sds) {
 		/*
-		 * When ASYM_PACKING; see if there's a more preferred CPU
-		 * currently idle; in which case, kick the ILB to move tasks
-		 * around.
+		 * If there is an imbalance between LLC domains (IOW we could
+		 * increase the overall cache use), we need some less-loaded LLC
+		 * domain to pull some load. Likewise, we may need to spread
+		 * load within the current LLC domain (e.g. packed SMT cores but
+		 * other CPUs are idle). We can't really know from here how busy
+		 * the others are - so just get a nohz balance going if it looks
+		 * like this LLC domain has tasks we could move.
 		 */
-		for_each_cpu_and(i, sched_domain_span(sd), nohz.idle_cpus_mask) {
-			if (sched_asym_prefer(i, cpu)) {
-				flags = NOHZ_KICK_MASK;
-				goto unlock;
-			}
+		nr_busy = atomic_read(&sds->nr_busy_cpus);
+		if (nr_busy > 1) {
+			flags = NOHZ_KICK_MASK;
+			goto unlock;
 		}
 	}
 unlock: