lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190309220317.25928-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Date:   Sat,  9 Mar 2019 14:03:17 -0800
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
        Markus Mayer <code@...yer.net>,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
        Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@...il.com>
Cc:     Markus Mayer <mmayer@...adcom.com>,
        ARM Kernel List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] soc: brcmstb: dpfe: use msleep() over udelay()

On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 17:24:41 -0800, Markus Mayer <code@...yer.net> wrote:
> From: Markus Mayer <mmayer@...adcom.com>
> 
> To be more "scheduler friendly", we use msleep() rather than udelay()
> while we wait for the DCPU to respond.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Mayer <mmayer@...adcom.com>
> ---

Applied to drivers/next, thanks!
--
Florian

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ