lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <341b78ca-9901-78f0-f404-59194f3da503@metux.net>
Date:   Sun, 10 Mar 2019 19:50:19 +0100
From:   "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <lkml@...ux.net>
To:     Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
        "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <info@...ux.net>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com,
        michal.lkml@...kovi.net, apw@...onical.com, joe@...ches.com,
        linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Debian build polishing

On 08.03.19 22:57, Theodore Ts'o wrote:

> The full debian directory lands in the O= directory.  So presumably
> you could make it work for use case if there was a "make O=/build/dir
> debian-prepare" which copies the necessary debian/ files into the
> build directory and then someone could cd into /build/dir and run
> "dpkg-buildpackage"?

Didn't touch these rules at all, so it should still work as it used to.

I thought about changing the old deb rules to just call the new
debian/rules file, but haven't done so yet.

Maybe you could find some time to test whether my approach also
works for you ?


--mtx

-- 
Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
Free software and Linux embedded engineering
info@...ux.net -- +49-151-27565287

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ