[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wi_krg9B2B0i7+mV4rRCdowiNw3bOC9rssaZTVFQvKMxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2019 13:56:53 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT pull] scheduler updates for 5.1
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 4:33 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
> A small set of fixes for the scheduler:
What? No.
This is completely broken, and even warns loudly about it.
kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c: In function ‘sugov_iowait_boost’:
./include/linux/kernel.h:827:29: warning: comparison of distinct
pointer types lacks a cast
kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c:346:26: note: in expansion of macro ‘min’
sg_cpu->iowait_boost = min(sg_cpu->iowait_boost << 1,
SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE);
^~~
because 'SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE' is of type 'long' and 'iowait_boost' is
'unsigned int'.
Why are you sending me code that hasn't even been compiled, and call it a "fix"?
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists