[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190310093738.72c1019b@archlinux>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2019 09:37:38 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: common: ssp_sensors: Initialize calculated_time in
ssp_common_process_data
On Thu, 7 Mar 2019 16:35:26 -0800
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 1:46 PM Nathan Chancellor
> <natechancellor@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > When building with -Wsometimes-uninitialized, Clang warns:
> >
> > drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_iio.c:95:6: warning: variable
> > 'calculated_time' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is false
> > [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
> >
> > While it isn't wrong, this will never be a problem because
> > iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp only uses calculated_time
> > on the same condition that it is assigned (when scan_timestamp
> > is not zero). While iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp is marked
> > as inline, Clang does inlining in the optimization stage, which
> > happens after the semantic analysis phase (plus inline is merely
> > a hint to the compiler).
> >
> > Fix this by just zero initializing calculated_time.
> >
> > Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/394
> > Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
>
> Knowing that the same invariant holds across function boundaries to
> protect access of unitialized values and thus undefined behavior
> sounds tricky to diagnose accurately. Thanks for the patch.
> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing
for the autobuilders to play with it.
Note this is going to be a while before it hits mainline but as
it is a false (if reasonable!) warning I'm not going to rush
it in as a fix.
Thanks,
Jonathan
>
> > ---
> > drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_iio.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_iio.c b/drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_iio.c
> > index 645f2e3975db..e38f704d88b7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_iio.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_iio.c
> > @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ int ssp_common_process_data(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, void *buf,
> > unsigned int len, int64_t timestamp)
> > {
> > __le32 time;
> > - int64_t calculated_time;
> > + int64_t calculated_time = 0;
> > struct ssp_sensor_data *spd = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> >
> > if (indio_dev->scan_bytes == 0)
> > --
> > 2.21.0
> >
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists