linux-kernel - Re: r8169 only works in promisc mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2fbb9488-198f-0a9c-af3b-bb45bf424884@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 10 Mar 2019 15:26:16 +0100
From:   Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
To:     Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Cc:     "Alex Xu (Hello71)" <alex_y_xu@...oo.ca>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: r8169 only works in promisc mode

On 10.03.2019 15:18, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Mar 2019 10:33:40 +0100
> Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 09.03.2019 03:16, Alex Xu (Hello71) wrote:
>>> After suspending, my r8169 (not actually 8169, just that driver) only 
>>> receives packets when in promiscuous mode. I have tried disabling all 
>>> offload features except highdma [fixed], and it doesn't fix the issue.
>>>
>>> I am using torvalds/linux, compiled about two days ago (not sure which 
>>> commit). I think this happened after a recent upgrade (some time in the 
>>> past week). Given the long testing cycle, I don't really want to bisect; 
>>> I am hoping someone has some idea of where the issue could be.
>>>   
>> The provided information isn't enough to say anything. Please create a
>> bug ticket in bugzilla. Needed information:
>> - Last working and first failing kernel version (as reported by uname -a)
>> - Is 5.0 ok?
>> - Full dmesg log
>> - lspci -vv output for the network card
>> - If the issue happens only after resume from suspend, diff of the
>>   chip registers (ethtool -d) before and after suspend.
>> - Does removing / reloading the r8169 module fix the issue?
>>
>>> Please CC me on replies.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Alex.
>>>   
>> Heiner
> 
> Bugzilla is not really used by Linux network developers.
> I just filter/forward mail from bugzilla into netdev.
> 
To make sure I understand you correctly:
Are you just saying "network developers don't actively scan bugzilla"
or do you want to say that bugzilla shouldn't be used in general for
netdev bugs/issues? What would be the right tool then?