[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGngYiVuh16dzSUvjZN0EcnaMy_n4_8Zzzth1M9XJTRQU6D8Ag@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 16:01:44 -0400
From: Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@...il.com>
To: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, mark.rutland@....com,
treding@...dia.com, David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>,
noralf@...nnes.org, johan@...nel.org,
Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>, michal.vokac@...ft.com,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, john.garry@...wei.com,
geert+renesas@...der.be, robin.murphy@....com,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
sebastien.bourdelin@...oirfairelinux.com, icenowy@...c.io,
Stuart Yoder <stuyoder@...il.com>, maxime.ripard@...tlin.com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/6] Add Fieldbus subsystem + support HMS Profinet card
Hi Andreas,
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 1:25 PM Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de> wrote:
>
> I have two unfinished drivers that might benefit, for Hilscher netX 52
> (multi-protocol) and Microchip LAN9252 (EtherCAT), as well as a Linux
> port for Infineon XMC4500 that might be expanded to XMC4800 (EtherCAT).
>
> But currently -ENOTIME for review or development, sorry.
>
> Staging sounds like a plan, if that allows us to still break the ABI.
Those devices have very similar functionality to the h/w we use.
It would be awesome if we could find common ground here.
And the userspace ABI design could definitely benefit from 2-3 extra
supported devices to verify it against.
>
> Are you at Netdev 0x13 later this month? That might be an opportunity to
> discuss the network-related parts such as Profinet and EtherCAT.
Will send you an off-list message.
Cheers,
Sven
Powered by blists - more mailing lists