[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEdQ38F3RxBXB2ow3L7F4vQd5JnJLPJ-mEqCK5ENV7NDQO9eJQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 13:50:21 -0700
From: Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>
To: Måns Rullgård <mans@...sr.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Alan Cox <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>,
linux-alpha <linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Deprecate a.out support
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 12:47 PM Måns Rullgård <mans@...sr.com> wrote:
>
> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 11:08 AM Måns Rullgård <mans@...sr.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> The latest version I have is 5.1, and that uses ECOFF.
> >
> > ECOFF _is_ a.out as far as Linux is concerned.
> >
> > So Linux basically treats ECOFF as "regular a.out with just some
> > header extensions".
> >
> > We don't have any specific support for ECOFF.
> >
> > I _think_. Again, it's been years and years.
>
> Right, which is why killing a.out entirely would have the unfortunate
> effect of also removing the OSF/1 compatibility on Alpha.
>
> If we are to support Alpha as an architecture at all, it makes sense to
> support the things people actually use it for.
I agree. I was not aware that a.out was effectively the same as ECOFF.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists