[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190311220953.GA8432@bogus>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 17:09:53 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Pi-Hsun Shih <pihsun@...omium.org>
Cc: Pi-Hsun Shih <pihsun@...omium.org>, Erin Lo <erin.lo@...iatek.com>,
Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
"open list:REMOTE PROCESSOR (REMOTEPROC) SUBSYSTEM"
<linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/7] dt-bindings: Add a binding for Mediatek SCP
On Mon, 11 Mar 2019 14:34:52 +0800, Pi-Hsun Shih wrote:
> From: Erin Lo <erin.lo@...iatek.com>
>
> Add a DT binding documentation of SCP for the
> MT8183 SoC from Mediatek.
>
> Signed-off-by: Erin Lo <erin.lo@...iatek.com>
> ---
> Changes from v5:
> - Remove dependency on CONFIG_RPMSG_MTK_SCP.
>
> Changes from v4:
> - Add detail of more properties.
> - Document the usage of mtk,rpmsg-name in subnode from the new design.
>
> Changes from v3:
> - No change.
>
> Changes from v2:
> - No change. I realized that for this patch series, there's no need to
> add anything under the mt8183-scp node (neither the mt8183-rpmsg or
> the cros-ec-rpmsg) for them to work, since mt8183-rpmsg is added
> directly as a rproc_subdev by code, and cros-ec-rpmsg is dynamically
> created by SCP name service.
>
> Changes from v1:
> - No change.
> ---
> .../bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.txt | 36 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mtk,scp.txt
>
Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists