linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH V2 5/5] vhost: access vq metadata through kernel virtual address

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 11 Mar 2019 15:21:41 +0800
From:   Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To:     Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Cc:     Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterx@...hat.com,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V2 5/5] vhost: access vq metadata through kernel
 virtual address


On 2019/3/9 上午3:11, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 05:13:26PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>> Actually not wrapping around,  the pages for used ring was marked as
>> dirty after a round of virtqueue processing when we're sure vhost wrote
>> something there.
> Thanks for the clarification. So we need to convert it to
> set_page_dirty and move it to the mmu notifier invalidate but in those
> cases where gup_fast was called with write=1 (1 out of 3).
>
> If using ->invalidate_range the page pin also must be removed
> immediately after get_user_pages returns (not ok to hold the pin in
> vmap until ->invalidate_range is called) to avoid false positive gup
> pin checks in things like KSM, or the pin must be released in
> invalidate_range_start (which is called before the pin checks).
>
> Here's why:
>
> 		/*
> 		 * Check that no O_DIRECT or similar I/O is in progress on the
> 		 * page
> 		 */
> 		if (page_mapcount(page) + 1 + swapped != page_count(page)) {
> 			set_pte_at(mm, pvmw.address, pvmw.pte, entry);
> 			goto out_unlock;
> 		}
> 		[..]
> 		set_pte_at_notify(mm, pvmw.address, pvmw.pte, entry);
> 			  ^^^^^^^ too late release the pin here, the
> 				  above already failed
>
> ->invalidate_range cannot be used with mutex anyway so you need to go
> back with invalidate_range_start/end anyway, just the pin must be
> released in _start at the latest in such case.


Yes.


>
> My prefer is generally to call gup_fast() followed by immediate
> put_page() because I always want to drop FOLL_GET from gup_fast as a
> whole to avoid 2 useless atomic ops per gup_fast.


Ok, will do this (if I still plan to use vmap() in next version).


>
> I'll write more about vmap in answer to the other email.
>
> Thanks,
> Andrea


Thanks