[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1903111403330.1691@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 14:05:07 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
cc: corbet@....net, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Fix up l1ft documentation was Re: Taking a break - time
to look back
On Mon, 11 Mar 2019, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Thu 2019-01-03 00:51:52, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > The next round of speculation-related issues including the scary L1TF
> > > hardware bug was a way more "pleasant" experience to work on. While for
> > > obvious reasons the mitigation development happened behind closed doors in
> > > a smaller group of people, we were at least able to collaborate in a way
> > > which is somehow close to what we are used to.
> >
> > Ok, I guess L1TF was a lot of fun, and there was not time for a good
> > documentation.
> >
> > There's admin guide that is written as an advertisment, and
What's advertisement there?
> > unfortunately is slightly "inaccurate" at places (to the point of
> > lying).
Huch? Care to tell what's a lie instead of making bold statements?
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists