[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1552312822.7087.11.camel@lca.pw>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 10:00:22 -0400
From: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/debug: add a cast to u64 for atomic64_read()
On Mon, 2019-03-11 at 12:21 +0000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 08:58:15PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > On Sun, 10 Mar 2019, Qian Cai wrote:
> >
> > > atomic64_read() on ppc64le returns "long int", so fix the same way as
> > > the commit d549f545e690 ("drm/virtio: use %llu format string form
> > > atomic64_t") by adding a cast to u64, which makes it work on all arches.
> > >
> > > In file included from ./include/linux/printk.h:7,
> > > from ./include/linux/kernel.h:15,
> > > from mm/debug.c:9:
> > > mm/debug.c: In function 'dump_mm':
> > > ./include/linux/kern_levels.h:5:18: warning: format '%llx' expects
> > > argument of type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 19 has type
> > > 'long int' [-Wformat=]
> > > #define KERN_SOH "\001" /* ASCII Start Of Header */
> > > ^~~~~~
> > > ./include/linux/kern_levels.h:8:20: note: in expansion of macro
> > > 'KERN_SOH'
> > > #define KERN_EMERG KERN_SOH "0" /* system is unusable */
> > > ^~~~~~~~
> > > ./include/linux/printk.h:297:9: note: in expansion of macro 'KERN_EMERG'
> > > printk(KERN_EMERG pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
> > > ^~~~~~~~~~
> > > mm/debug.c:133:2: note: in expansion of macro 'pr_emerg'
> > > pr_emerg("mm %px mmap %px seqnum %llu task_size %lu\n"
> > > ^~~~~~~~
> > > mm/debug.c:140:17: note: format string is defined here
> > > "pinned_vm %llx data_vm %lx exec_vm %lx stack_vm %lx\n"
> > > ~~~^
> > > %lx
> > >
> > > Fixes: 70f8a3ca68d3 ("mm: make mm->pinned_vm an atomic64 counter")
> > > Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
> >
> > Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
>
> Not saying this patch shouldn't go ahead..
>
> But is there a special reason the atomic64*'s on ppc don't use the u64
> type like other archs? Seems like a better thing to fix than adding
> casts all over the place.
>
A bit of history here,
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7344011/#15495901
Powered by blists - more mailing lists