linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net] net: sit: fix UBSAN Undefined behaviour in check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190311.102937.1716496269975009682.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Mon, 11 Mar 2019 10:29:37 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     linmiaohe@...wei.com
Cc:     kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        mingfangsen@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: sit: fix UBSAN Undefined behaviour in
 check_6rd

From: linmiaohe <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 16:29:32 +0800

> @@ -778,8 +778,9 @@ static bool check_6rd(struct ip_tunnel *tunnel, const struct in6_addr *v6dst,
>  		pbw0 = tunnel->ip6rd.prefixlen >> 5;
>  		pbi0 = tunnel->ip6rd.prefixlen & 0x1f;
> 
> -		d = (ntohl(v6dst->s6_addr32[pbw0]) << pbi0) >>
> -		    tunnel->ip6rd.relay_prefixlen;
> +		d = tunnel->ip6rd.relay_prefixlen < 32 ?
> +			(ntohl(v6dst->s6_addr32[pbw0]) << pbi0) >>
> +		    tunnel->ip6rd.relay_prefixlen : 0;
> 

I hate the fact that we have to guard against something which the rest
of the code makes sure NEVER EVER happens.

Every assignment of ->relay_prefixlen is guarded by a check against 32.

I don't like this at all, and I have to put my foot down somehow.

So I'm not applying this, sorry.