linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/MCE/AMD, EDAC/mce_amd: Don't report L1 BTB MCA errors on some Family 17h models

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190311190145.GE7384@zn.tnic>
Date:   Mon, 11 Mar 2019 20:01:45 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     "Ghannam, Yazen" <Yazen.Ghannam@....com>
Cc:     "linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "rafal@...ecki.pl" <rafal@...ecki.pl>,
        "clemej@...il.com" <clemej@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/MCE/AMD, EDAC/mce_amd: Don't report L1 BTB MCA
 errors on some Family 17h models

On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 06:52:05PM +0000, Ghannam, Yazen wrote:
> Should I keep the filter in edac_mce_amd? I guess it's not necessary
> if filtered out earlier.

Nah, you don't need to touch that if you filter earlier.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.