[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190311023544-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 02:36:17 -0400
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, amit@...nel.org,
arnd@...db.de, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, xiaohli@...hat.com,
Gal Hammer <ghammer@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio_console: free unused buffers with virtio port
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 01:58:11AM -0400, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
>
> >
> > The commit a7a69ec0d8e4 ("virtio_console: free buffers after reset")
> > deffered detaching of unused buffer to virtio device unplug time.
> >
> > This causes unplug/replug of single port in virtio device with an
> > error "Error allocating inbufs\n". As we don't free the unused buffers
> > attached with the port. Re-plug the same port tries to allocate new
> > buffers in virtqueue and results in this error if queue is full.
> >
> > This patch removes the unused buffers in vq's when we unplug the port.
> > This is the best we can do as we cannot call device_reset because virtio
> > device is still active. This was the working behaviour before the change
> > introduced in commit b3258ff1d6.
>
> ping.
>
> This patch fixes a regression in upstream kernel, virtio_console driver.
> Can we please have this merged.
>
> Thanks,
> Pankaj
Sorry, no, I don't think that's a full fix.
> >
> > Reported-by: Xiaohui Li <xiaohli@...hat.com>
> > Fixes: b3258ff1d6 ("virtio_console: free buffers after reset")
> > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@...hat.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/char/virtio_console.c | 14 +++++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
> > index fbeb71953526..5fbf2ac73111 100644
> > --- a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
> > +++ b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
> > @@ -1506,15 +1506,25 @@ static void remove_port(struct kref *kref)
> > kfree(port);
> > }
> >
> > +static void remove_unused_bufs(struct virtqueue *vq)
> > +{
> > + struct port_buffer *buf;
> > +
> > + while ((buf = virtqueue_detach_unused_buf(vq)))
> > + free_buf(buf, true);
> > +}
> > +
> > static void remove_port_data(struct port *port)
> > {
> > spin_lock_irq(&port->inbuf_lock);
> > /* Remove unused data this port might have received. */
> > discard_port_data(port);
> > + remove_unused_bufs(port->in_vq);
> > spin_unlock_irq(&port->inbuf_lock);
> >
> > spin_lock_irq(&port->outvq_lock);
> > reclaim_consumed_buffers(port);
> > + remove_unused_bufs(port->out_vq);
> > spin_unlock_irq(&port->outvq_lock);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -1950,11 +1960,9 @@ static void remove_vqs(struct ports_device *portdev)
> > struct virtqueue *vq;
> >
> > virtio_device_for_each_vq(portdev->vdev, vq) {
> > - struct port_buffer *buf;
> >
> > flush_bufs(vq, true);
> > - while ((buf = virtqueue_detach_unused_buf(vq)))
> > - free_buf(buf, true);
> > + remove_unused_bufs(vq);
> > }
> > portdev->vdev->config->del_vqs(portdev->vdev);
> > kfree(portdev->in_vqs);
> > --
> > 2.20.1
> >
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists