[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 20:29:44 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Russ Anderson <rja@....com>,
Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com>,
Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@....com>,
Mike Travis <mike.travis@....com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@...hat.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
linux-efi <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86-ml <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: Please revert 7212e37cbdf9 from 4.4-stable
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 01:48:14PM +0000, Hedi Berriche wrote:
>Hi Greg,
>
>Could you please revert
>
> 7212e37cbdf9 x86/platform/UV: Use efi_runtime_lock to serialise BIOS calls
>
>from 4.4-stable?
>
>In 4.4-stable efi_runtime_lock as defined in drivers/firmware/efi/runtime-wrappers.c
>is a spinlock (given it predates commit dce48e351c0d) and commit
>
> f331e766c4be x86/platform/UV: Use efi_runtime_lock to serialise BIOS calls
>
>which 7212e37cbdf9 is a backport of, needs it to be a semaphore.
I've queued up the revert. I'm not sure how it ended up on 4.4 to begin
with; sorry about that and thank you.
--
Thanks,
Sasha
Powered by blists - more mailing lists